Re: Split comp.databases.informix!
Posted in 1996
William Harris wrote: > > > I find it quite easy to skip that which I don't want to read. (Fortunately I > can read the group via a news server - I find it interesting that those on the > mailing list and getting more "junk" seem to be the people most opposed to the > proposal.) > > In any case, the volume of traffic in this group doesn't really justify > splitting it into twelve (!) subgroups. Maybe .announce, > .troubleshooting, .programming, and .misc - but again, the volume isn't -that- > high. Myself, I don't see a lot of value in splitting the group. Food for thought. By splitting the groups, most will probably select to read all the groups and all you would do is increase the amount of spamming. Instead of getting one spammed article, you will get 12!. I vote no on splitting the group. -Mikey