Translating with DrWatson… this can take a few seconds the first time.
This is a genuine, complex translation. DrWatson protects commands, error codes, and log output while naturally translating the surrounding text. It’s translated once and saved.
Scott Burns said his company was evaluating moving from SE to PostgreSQL; the main gotcha was needing transactions, since committing closes all open cursors. Asked about performance, he said his sites' load is light and that SE support cost and platform hoops were the real drivers. Andrej Falout pointed to an Informix compatibility patch for PostgreSQL and an ecpg compiler. No firm conclusion.
Auto-generated by Claude from the posts below — may be imperfect; read the full thread.
Scott Burns — — source: Usenet: comp.databases.informix
Victor Dario Martinez wrote:
>Hi !. I need info about cases or tools of migrating Infomix to PostgreSQL.
>
>Any info will very very important .
>
>Thanks !!
>
>sending to informix-list
>
>
Hi,
we are evaluating going from SE to Postgres. So far the biggest
gotcha was having to use transactions, and the biggest gotcha with that
was commiting work to the database closes all open cursors.
How complicated are your database needs?
--
Scott Burns
Mirrabooka Systems
Tel +61 7 3857 7899
Fax +61 7 3857 1368
Scott Burns wrote:
> Victor Dario Martinez wrote:
>
>>Hi !. I need info about cases or tools of migrating Infomix to PostgreSQL.
>>
>>Any info will very very important .
>>
>>Thanks !!
>>
>>sending to informix-list
>>
>>
> Hi,
> we are evaluating going from SE to Postgres. So far the biggest
> gotcha was having to use transactions, and the biggest gotcha with that
> was commiting work to the database closes all open cursors.
So you haven't got to the performance testing part yet?
--
Strewth! Stick a sock in it, Sheila!
↪ replying to My Name Is Bruce and I'm A Sock Puppet
Scott Burns — — source: Usenet: comp.databases.informix
My Name Is Bruce and I'm A Sock Puppet wrote:
>
>
>So you haven't got to the performance testing part yet?
>
>
>
It's not really an issue. At our busiest site we would have maybe one
database update to a single record every few seconds for most of the
day. We have a period of reporting in the morning which prints to a dot
matrix printer. I'm expecting Postgres to be faster than a dot matrix.
End of week/season/year can take a while but we're still talking seconds
under SE. Postgres can take minutes if it likes - copying the data
offsite over the WAN is the real time hog.
We have deployed Postgres twice in a limited capacity to sites with far
less traffic and experienced no performance issues.
Now compare that with the hoops we needed to jump through to get SE to
run on RHEL3 or RH9, tack on a 50% hike in support and think about how
many people are likely to be familiar with Postgres in 5 years as
opposed to Informix.
It's really going to come down to why Victor is looking to change, and
performance may not be the reason.
--
Scott Burns
Mirrabooka Systems
Tel +61 7 3857 7899
Fax +61 7 3857 1368
↪ replying to Scott Burns
Andrej Falout — — source: Usenet: comp.databases.informix
Guys;
There is Informix compatibility patch for PG and ecpg compiler:
http://gborg.postgresql.org/project/pginformix/projdisplay.php
There is allready patched code available from:
http://informix.fastcrypt.com/
Older RPM's:
http://informix.postgresintl.com/
We are using them as part of Aubit 4GL compiler project.
There is at least one company that is using them in production
situation.
HTH,
Andrej Falout
----== Posted via Newsfeed.Com - Unlimited-Uncensored-Secure Usenet News==----
http://www.newsfeed.com The #1 Newsgroup Service in the World! >100,000 Newsgroups
---= 19 East/West-Coast Specialized Servers - Total Privacy via Encryption =---
We use strictly necessary cookies to make this site work. With your
consent we’d also use optional cookies for analytics and marketing. You can accept all,
reject all, or choose. Read our Cookie Policy.