Re: 9.30 upgrade: 9.40 or 10?

malc_p@btinternet.com said: > > (Currently on 9.30HC5, HPUX 11i platform, mainly OLTP, some DS; mostly > i4GL, some java-in-engine). > > PPA shows both 9.40 & 10.0 have no EOM or EOS dates listed. > Which should we choose and why? > > Ta > Malc (abdicating responsibility to the collective list wisdom) 10.0 just because it *will* have a longer shelf life. (And fewer bugs, and more features ...) -- Bye now, Obnoxio "C'est pas parce qu'on n'a rien ` dire qu'il faut fermer sa gueule" - Coluche did i mention i like nulls? heck, i even go so far as to say that all columns in a table except the primary key could/should be nullable. this has certain advantages, for example, if you need to insert a child record and you don't have a parent row for it, just do an insert into the parent table with the primary key value (everything else null), and voila, relational integrity is preserved. but this is, admittedly, a bit controversial among modellers. --r937, dbforums.com sending to informix-list