Re: Year 2000 is NOT a leap year

In article <5pun4v$doe@cssun.mathcs.emory.edu>, johnl@informix.com writes: > > Where does your formula produce a different result (as opposed to > computation time) from the one I gave? > > The answer is nowhere! > > See the attached code for a demonstration for the years 1753 through 9999. You're right. I misread your post... hey it happens. > Please get your facts straight before telling me to get mine sorted out. Why is it that you feel it necessary to take this tone with me? ``It's nice to be important, but it's important to be nice.'' Anonymous and... ``Some people lose sight of the fact that a computer is basically a fancy filing cabinet. Those people are doomed to failure in the computer industry.'' Larry McVoy -- Pablo Sanchez | wk: 415.933.3812| pg: 800.930.5635 -or- pablo_p@pager.sgi.com --------------+-----------------+-------------------------------------------- pablo@sgi.com ... when mailing me, place "not spam" in the Subject