Posted in 1998
Neil,
The number of kio vps is determined by the number of cpu vps
configured on your instance. I also think that you get a max queue of
16 pretty quickly. I have seen my queue lengths on a heavily loaded
system reach 32.
Does anyone know what a high queue length is? Does a highr queue
length indicate a disk bottleneck or can adding physical cpu's (and
cpu vps) to the box help?
Thanks,
Doug
On Sat, 07 Feb 1998 04:17:27 GMT, jharris@westpac.com.au (Jason
Harris) wrote:
>Neil,
>
>Dont forget that BUFFWAITS do not always mean you dont have enough
>buiffers. If one thread A wants a record stored in buffer X but thread
>B is updating a record that is also in buffer X, thread A gets a
>BUFFWAIT.
>
>Jason
>
>On Fri, 06 Feb 1998 22:03:42 +0000, Neil Truby <ntruby@netcomuk.co.uk>
>wrote:
>
>>I've recently moved a poorly-performing database server from a Sun Sparc
>>20 to a Sun E4002 with 1.5 GBytes of memory, and 2 processors. It's
>>running superbly now, but I'm still keen to know where my bottlenecks
>>are.
>>
>>onstat -g ioq consistently shows my kio VP with a maxlength of 16,>>suggesting that the system is I/O bound. In a sample output of onstat
>>-g ioq in "Informix Unleashed", three kio VPs are shown, but no
>>explanation is given on how to configure a system to use this many (if
>>in fact you can).
>>
>>Does anyone know how to set up extra KAIO vps?
>>
>>Also, despite having 200M of BUFFERS, onstat -p is still showing some
>>bufwaits. The read cache rate is above 99%, but the write remains
>>around 87% - the same as on the Sparc when BUFFERS was set to 50M. The
>>new system isn't swapping and hardly pages; do the bufwaits suggest a
>>further increase in BUFFERS is warranted?
>>
>>Thanks
>>
>>Neil Truby
>>Chase Manhattan Bank
>>Bournemouth, UK
>>neil.truby@chase.com
We use strictly necessary cookies to make this site work. With your consent we’d also use optional cookies for analytics and marketing. You can accept all, reject all, or choose. Read our Cookie Policy.