Translating with DrWatson… this can take a few seconds the first time.
This is a genuine, complex translation. DrWatson protects commands, error codes, and log output while naturally translating the surrounding text. It’s translated once and saved.
Markus Bschorer asked whether ontape could restore a level-0 archive and then only some logical logs, such as 145 to 156 rather than to 250. itsme suggested onbar -r -n 156, then conceded ontape differs. Art Kagel said ontape restores every log in a given file or tape, so it only works if logs are in separate files; onbar can do point-in-time restore, ontape cannot.
Auto-generated by Claude from the posts below — may be imperfect; read the full thread.
Hi guys,
restoring a Level-0-archive using ontape -r and after that restoring
logical logs using ontape -l works without any problem.
Now, I have to restore a database-state, given after certain logical log.
Is it possible, to restore a Level-0-archive (which includes the logical log
144) and after that restore the logical logs 145 thru 156 (e.g.) , but not
145 thru 250 ?
Thanks for your answers!
Greetings
Markus
Try onbar -r -n 156
"Markus Bschorer" <mb@worxbox.com> wrote in message
news:bme2kg$2ke$04$1@news.t-online.com...
> Hi guys,
>
> restoring a Level-0-archive using ontape -r and after that restoring
> logical logs using ontape -l works without any problem.
>
> Now, I have to restore a database-state, given after certain logical log.
>
> Is it possible, to restore a Level-0-archive (which includes the logical
log
> 144) and after that restore the logical logs 145 thru 156 (e.g.) , but
not
> 145 thru 250 ?
>
> Thanks for your answers!
>
> Greetings
> Markus
>
>
>
>
>
>
↪ replying to Markus Bschorer
Art S. Kagel — — source: Usenet: comp.databases.informix
On Mon, 13 Oct 2003 07:36:54 -0400, Markus Bschorer wrote:
Using ontape? Only if the logical logs are on/in separate tapes/files. The
logical log restore phase will restore any and all log files it finds in a log
archive file/tape. So if you have a file with logs 145-156 and another with
logs 157-250 or individual log backup files containing one log each then the
answer is yes, otherwise no.
Onbar can perform a point-in-time restore, ie restore to 2003-10-07 12:45:56,
but ontape cannot.
Art S. Kagel
> Hi guys,
>
> restoring a Level-0-archive using ontape -r and after that restoring logical
> logs using ontape -l works without any problem.
>
> Now, I have to restore a database-state, given after certain logical log.
>
> Is it possible, to restore a Level-0-archive (which includes the logical log
> 144) and after that restore the logical logs 145 thru 156 (e.g.) , but not
> 145 thru 250 ?
>
> Thanks for your answers!
>
> Greetings
> Markus
Sorry, I thought you were using onbar. Art is right about ontape.
"itsme" <please.no.spam@no-spam.net.org.com> wrote in message
news:bmede7$peg$1@reader08.wxs.nl...
> Try onbar -r -n 156
>
> "Markus Bschorer" <mb@worxbox.com> wrote in message
> news:bme2kg$2ke$04$1@news.t-online.com...
> > Hi guys,
> >
> > restoring a Level-0-archive using ontape -r and after that restoring
> > logical logs using ontape -l works without any problem.
> >
> > Now, I have to restore a database-state, given after certain logical
log.
> >
> > Is it possible, to restore a Level-0-archive (which includes the logical
> log
> > 144) and after that restore the logical logs 145 thru 156 (e.g.) , but
> not
> > 145 thru 250 ?
> >
> > Thanks for your answers!
> >
> > Greetings
> > Markus
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
>
>
We use strictly necessary cookies to make this site work. With your
consent we’d also use optional cookies for analytics and marketing. You can accept all,
reject all, or choose. Read our Cookie Policy.