Re: onarchive vs ontape

From: Derek Runstadler <drunstad@my-deja.com> > >In article <7phgqs$s1o$1@taliesin.netcom.net.uk>, > "Neil Truby" <ntruby@netcomuk.co.uk> wrote: > > > > Willem Roos wrote in message <7ph5aa$tk$1@news.xmission.com>... > > > > > >I know this might be a very old debate, but will some kind > > >soul give me a good excuse for not using onarchive. ... > > > I need to convince others that > > >point-in-time recovery is not worth the effort of using > > >onarchive. > > > > Reasons for not using onarchive: > > > > 1. It's utter crap > > 2. It doesn't offer point-in-time recovery. > > >We've done point-in-time recovery with onarchive. OK, but it is still utter crap... :-) ______________________________________________________ Get Your Private, Free Email at http://www.hotmail.com