Re: Any BAD effects
Posted in 1998
In article <memo.19980813210616.58331I@wfsoftware.compulink.co.uk>, paulw@wfsoftware.co.uk wrote: > In article <6qusd8$2ij$1@news.xmission.com>, insight@shabakah.com () > wrote: > > > > > Hi, > > > > In doing continuous backup, you need a console, is there any bad > > effects if > > you run it through telnet? > > > > TIA, > > > > Nien > > > > > You don't have to have a console. You can run it from anyway (within > reason) > > Paul Watson # I don't suffer from > WF Software Ltd. # stress, I'm just > Tel. (+44) 1436 674729 # a carrier > Fax. (+44) 1436 678693 # > We do it that way: At informix startup, which is done by shell script which can be started via telnet session also, if needed, we start a background shell script (LLB_cont.sh) containing the onarchive command for continuous backup nohup LLB_cont.sh instance >> LLB_cont_instance.log 2>&1 & It's output is appended to a logfile as you can see. Process get's the init process as parent and logging out does no harm (nohup) We did not encounter any problems during the last 14 months Dick -- Richard Kofler EDVg-debis Systemhaus Vienna / Austria -----== Posted via Deja News, The Leader in Internet Discussion ==----- http://www.dejanews.com/rg_mkgrp.xp Create Your Own Free Member Forum