Re: 4gl Libraries

Nils Myklebust wrote: > Here is my standard make file for c4gl compilation (I don't know > anything about r4gl. I don't debug programs so I don't use it. I write > correct programs instead. Reasonably easy in 4GL.): > Yes, great. That's the way I work, or try to ;-). Debugging is usually a design failure on my part, or using C! <snip> > I have heard some use archives instead. I have never bothered doing > that. I can't realy see any benefits. The benefit of using an archive library is that the linker links only those object files that are actually used. It also figures out the dependencies for you. If you have many object files in your library that is a big benefit. <snip> > Nils Myklebust > NM Data AS > Norway > E-mail: Nils.Myklebust@nmdata.com > FAQ at: http://www.iiug.org/techinfo/faq/faq_top.html > (Now with ODBC info under "Third party products".) -- Peter Lancashire Information Systems Specialist, Bayer plc Eastern Way, Bury St Edmunds, Suffolk, IP32 7AH, UK Tel: +44-1635-562258, Fax: +44-1635-562281 Mail: Peter.Lancashire.PL1@bayer.co.uk --- My Internet plumbing does not allow me to mail and post news together. Sorry. All opinions are my own and not those of Bayer plc. --- Join Infuse, the UK Informix User Group at http://www.infuse.org.uk/