Re: Unattended ontape

Posted in 2004

Andrew Hamm — Wed, 21 Apr 2004 15:05:08 +1000 — source: Usenet: comp.databases.informix

Simmons, Keith wrote: > -> > -> Andy Kent wrote: > -> > I thought unattended anything was expressly discouraged > -> with ontape? > -> > -> Unattended ontape is pure evil. [watch the accusations fly now!] > > See previous posts on the benefits of expect ! Expect cannot change the tape.