Re: Informix conference

On Fri, 19 May 2006 03:21:05 +0100, "Captain Pedantic" <theharlequin36@hotmail.com> wrote: >"John Carlson" <jwcarlson1@yahoo.com.invalid> wrote in message >news:049q6295o7ue1qvlqqh955hbk24ohpjiff@4ax.com... >> On 18 May 2006 18:36:49 -0700, david@smooth1.co.uk wrote: >> >> Now if they can just >>>get the bugs out. I have been hit by the last 2 Tech Flashs and 3 more >>>bugs as well recently. >> >> And do a *real* benchmark . . . . . >> >>> >>>When the DB2 DBAs who have encountered no bugs ask why Informix is so >>>unreliable what do I say? >> >> That you don't believe them? No bugs? > >Of course all software has bugs. But successive versions of IDS 10, >certainly xC3 and xC4, have had some howlers. xC4 has re-introduced some >old errors, and there are definitely QA issues that need to be ironed out. > Such as . . . ? Are they platform-specific? JWC