Re: NewEra 2.0 and Win95 ? (fwd)

Rajeev SRK Nimmagadda <rajeevn@lmis.jcdc.doleta.gov> wrote: > Hi, > > By the I way looked at New Era 3.0 like a month Ago At Menlo Park CA. > (OFFICAILLY for 2 days). > Boy! I liked it So much!. I, too, had a hands-on couple of days with 3.0 in Menlo. Sounds like we were both at the same sort of thing. I concur with the conclusion... > We want to be able to develop in a environment which is better. > (Obviously 32-bit) > But we should be able to compile the code into any environment we want > (16-bit and 32-bit). (Just 6 months ago I programmed in 8-bit) > > I want to know if anybody else wants the same situation. Actually, I understand that 3.0 will now be deploy-able on 16-bit as well as 32. You won't be able to take advantage of the 32-bit features, naturally, but you will be able to use 3.0 compiled code on 16-bit platforms. This one of our "biggie" issues in the debriefing at Menlo (and at the Customer Advisory Board meeting in March). - Corinne -- Corinne Gregory, Consulting Services Manager ASIX, Inc. 777 108th Ave. NE, Suite 1830, Bellevue WA 98004-5118 corinne.gregory@asix.com