Re: Informix SE on "Raw" filesystems - bunk?

Posted in 1995

Ian Goddard — Mon, 23 Oct 1995 22:10:03 — source: Informix-list mailing list archive (1991-1998)

In article <464j5f$lht@numbers.wetware.com> cse@wetware.com (Scott Ellard) writes: >From: cse@wetware.com (Scott Ellard) >Subject: Re: Informix SE on "Raw" filesystems - bunk? >Date: 19 Oct 1995 04:11:27 GMT >In article <461kgo$jje@news.informix.com> aland@informix.com (Colonel Panic) writes: >>In article <4I2gw0ElJH/N083yn@kcbbs.gen.nz>, >>Kerry Sainsbury <kerry@kcbbs.gen.nz> wrote: >>>Just been going thru old partially-read email and discovered a "correction" >>>to the FAQ from a fellow who claims you can run SE on "raw" file-systems. >>> >>>Sounds like bunk. Looks like bunk. Smells like bunk. What can it be? >> >>It's bunk. >>Alan Denney aland@informix.com >Alan, My friend, it can be done. Scott OK, so how's it done, Scott. Ian