Translating with DrWatson… this can take a few seconds the first time.
This is a genuine, complex translation. DrWatson protects commands, error codes, and log output while naturally translating the surrounding text. It’s translated once and saved.
The original poster needed to justify a 4 CPU database server over a 2 CPU one for about 100 users on DSS databases. allenj said multiprocessor overhead often outweighs the benefit with only 2 processors, and reported 4 to 5 times faster in some cases after moving to 4 CPUs. Neil Truby advised checking for CPU bottlenecks first, since memory might be the better buy.
Auto-generated by Claude from the posts below — may be imperfect; read the full thread.
I need to justify the purchase of a 4 CPU database server over a
2 CPU database server. This server will be used for about 100
concurrent users and the databases on it will be extensively DSS
databases.
Any good justifications ?
Sent via Deja.com http://www.deja.com/
Share what you know. Learn what you don't.
↪ replying to agrantha@my-deja.com
allenj — — source: Informix-list mailing list archive (1991-1998)
Typically, the overhead of enabling the multiprocessor code in Informix
is more than the benefit you receive when you have only 2 physical
processors. If you have 4 processors, however, you can use the
multiprocessor code and know fer sure that its worth it.
Also, I myself went from a 2-processor HP J200 box to a 4 processor HP
K260 box, and I now have a VERY happy database (and users). The
performance is not twice as fast, but in some cases 4 or 5 times as
fast. Now whether this is due more to the new RAID array, or the
additional memory...I don't know. But I look down sometimes and see all
4 processors getting beat on.............
You definitely want the 4 processors for DSS-heavy stuff.
HTH
aj
agrantha@my-deja.com wrote:
>
> I need to justify the purchase of a 4 CPU database server over a
> 2 CPU database server. This server will be used for about 100
> concurrent users and the databases on it will be extensively DSS
> databases.
>
> Any good justifications ?
>
> Sent via Deja.com http://www.deja.com/
> Share what you know. Learn what you don't.
↪ replying to agrantha@my-deja.com
Fergus Hayne — — source: Informix-list mailing list archive (1991-1998)
Buy me 4 processors or I'll sulk.
<agrantha@my-deja.com> wrote in message news:7qlu3f$f6k$1@nnrp1.deja.com...
> I need to justify the purchase of a 4 CPU database server over a
> 2 CPU database server. This server will be used for about 100
> concurrent users and the databases on it will be extensively DSS
> databases.
>
> Any good justifications ?
>
>
>
> Sent via Deja.com http://www.deja.com/
> Share what you know. Learn what you don't.
↪ replying to agrantha@my-deja.com
Neil Truby — — source: Informix-list mailing list archive (1991-1998)
agrantha@my-deja.com wrote in message <7qlu3f$f6k$1@nnrp1.deja.com>...
>I need to justify the purchase of a 4 CPU database server over a
>2 CPU database server. This server will be used for about 100
>concurrent users and the databases on it will be extensively DSS
>databases.
>
>Any good justifications ?
Well, why do you want to buy more? You need to analyse the performance of
your application, and see where the bottlenecks in performance, if any, are.
There's little point in spending money on extra CPUs if your cpuvs are not
constantly queued up, and UNIX is not CPU bound. You could save the money
and buy memory instead, if the system is memory bound.
Your privacy choices
We use strictly necessary cookies to make this site work. With your
consent we’d also use optional cookies for analytics and marketing. You can accept all,
reject all, or choose. Read our Cookie Policy.