Re: Informix (raw or cooked)?

Posted in 1995

Billy Wheeler — 14 Nov 1995 04:38:03 -0500 — source: Informix-list mailing list archive (1991-1998)

>Definitely RAW. On some systems (notably HP) cooked may actually be >faster, but this is a very foolish risk. If the file system is >corrupted, fsck will have a fun time with your data. An interesting point. And one I always forget when I recommend raw over cooked... :-) Thank you for making again. -- Cheers, Billy ----------------------------------------------------------------------------- INCLUDE "Disclaimer.4gh" -- my opinions are INCLUDE "FlamesToDevNull.4gh" -- flamers, eat my shorts! INCLUDE "CaveatEmptor.4gh" -- take my advice at your own risk INCLUDE "ThirtySomething.4gh" -- header file for this class -- Written by : Billy Wheeler, Date: today -- Copyright (c) 1995, The West Solutions Group