strange error: CDR RQM rqmPurgeSpool() failed for KEY...

Posted in 2003

Hoyte Swager — Sat, 25 Oct 2003 18:57:10 GMT — source: Usenet: comp.databases.informix

20:50:58 On-Line Mode 20:50:59 CDR GC: catalog recovery begin 20:51:01 CDR GC: catalog recovery complete > 20:51:01 CDR RQM: rqmPurgeSpool() failed for KEY (10/0/0x3/0x0) dberror=-7420 thread 46 queue control_send 20:51:01 CDR queuer initialization complete 20:51:01 CDR NIF listening on asf://g_vfs1 20:51:01 DDR Log Snooping - Snooping started in log 63 hi there anyone knows what causes the RQM error? finderr -7420 gives: -7420 Argument argument_name is invalid. Verify the arguments to the DataBlade API calls. but that does not help me either. any help appreciated regards hoyte swager env: Linux vfs1 2.4.21 #2 Wed Aug 13 12:23:17 CEST 2003 i686 unknown IBM Informix Dynamic Server Version 9.40.UC2E1 -- On-Line (Prim) -- Up 00:05:02 -- 471464 Kbytes

↪ replying to Hoyte Swager

Madison Pruet — Sat, 25 Oct 2003 19:19:29 GMT — source: Usenet: comp.databases.informix

I thought that we had gotten rid of all of these. Basically we were trying to remove a control message and it appears that part of the message had been deleted during the prior session. That left the header part of the message but not the rest of the message. Since we were removing the message, that means that we had received the ACK of the message. My guess is that we were in the process of removing the queued message in the prior session when the engine was brought down. Either that or we received ACKs from two servers at the same time and processed the ACK in parallel - resulting in a race condition. Please open a case on this problem. M.P. "Hoyte Swager" <h.swager@chello.nl> wrote in message news:aIzmb.376338$lh.97132108@amsnews02.chello.com... > > 20:50:58 On-Line Mode > 20:50:59 CDR GC: catalog recovery begin > 20:51:01 CDR GC: catalog recovery complete > > 20:51:01 CDR RQM: rqmPurgeSpool() failed for KEY (10/0/0x3/0x0)> dberror=-7420 thread 46 queue control_send > 20:51:01 CDR queuer initialization complete > 20:51:01 CDR NIF listening on asf://g_vfs1 > 20:51:01 DDR Log Snooping - Snooping started in log 63 > > > hi there > anyone knows what causes the RQM error? > finderr -7420 gives: > > -7420 Argument argument_name is invalid. > > Verify the arguments to the DataBlade API calls. > > but that does not help me either. > any help appreciated > regards > hoyte swager > > env: > Linux vfs1 2.4.21 #2 Wed Aug 13 12:23:17 CEST 2003 i686 unknown > IBM Informix Dynamic Server Version 9.40.UC2E1 -- On-Line (Prim) -- Up > 00:05:02 -- 471464 Kbytes> >

↪ replying to Madison Pruet

Hoyte Swager — Sat, 25 Oct 2003 20:00:08 GMT — source: Usenet: comp.databases.informix

will do btw is 9.40-UC2E1 the most current release? regards hoyte "Madison Pruet" <mpruet@comcast.net> wrote in message news:51Amb.13115$275.27298@attbi_s53... > I thought that we had gotten rid of all of these. > > Basically we were trying to remove a control message and it appears that > part of the message had been deleted during the prior session. That left > the header part of the message but not the rest of the message. Since we > were removing the message, that means that we had received the ACK of the > message. > > My guess is that we were in the process of removing the queued message in > the prior session when the engine was brought down. Either that or we > received ACKs from two servers at the same time and processed the ACK in > parallel - resulting in a race condition. > > Please open a case on this problem. > > M.P. > > > "Hoyte Swager" <h.swager@chello.nl> wrote in message > news:aIzmb.376338$lh.97132108@amsnews02.chello.com... > > > > 20:50:58 On-Line Mode > > 20:50:59 CDR GC: catalog recovery begin > > 20:51:01 CDR GC: catalog recovery complete > > > 20:51:01 CDR RQM: rqmPurgeSpool() failed for KEY (10/0/0x3/0x0)> > dberror=-7420 thread 46 queue control_send > > 20:51:01 CDR queuer initialization complete > > 20:51:01 CDR NIF listening on asf://g_vfs1 > > 20:51:01 DDR Log Snooping - Snooping started in log 63 > > > > > > hi there > > anyone knows what causes the RQM error? > > finderr -7420 gives: > > > > -7420 Argument argument_name is invalid. > > > > Verify the arguments to the DataBlade API calls. > > > > but that does not help me either. > > any help appreciated > > regards > > hoyte swager > > > > env: > > Linux vfs1 2.4.21 #2 Wed Aug 13 12:23:17 CEST 2003 i686 unknown > > IBM Informix Dynamic Server Version 9.40.UC2E1 -- On-Line (Prim) -- Up > > 00:05:02 -- 471464 Kbytes> > > > > >

↪ replying to Hoyte Swager

Madison Pruet — Sun, 26 Oct 2003 00:00:37 GMT — source: Usenet: comp.databases.informix

I thought that UC3 was out now. "Hoyte Swager" <h.swager@chello.nl> wrote in message news:cDAmb.376635$lh.97343339@amsnews02.chello.com... > will do > btw is 9.40-UC2E1 the most current release? > regards > hoyte > > "Madison Pruet" <mpruet@comcast.net> wrote in message > news:51Amb.13115$275.27298@attbi_s53... > > I thought that we had gotten rid of all of these. > > > > Basically we were trying to remove a control message and it appears that > > part of the message had been deleted during the prior session. That left > > the header part of the message but not the rest of the message. Since we > > were removing the message, that means that we had received the ACK of the > > message. > > > > My guess is that we were in the process of removing the queued message in > > the prior session when the engine was brought down. Either that or we > > received ACKs from two servers at the same time and processed the ACK in > > parallel - resulting in a race condition. > > > > Please open a case on this problem. > > > > M.P. > > > > > > "Hoyte Swager" <h.swager@chello.nl> wrote in message > > news:aIzmb.376338$lh.97132108@amsnews02.chello.com... > > > > > > 20:50:58 On-Line Mode > > > 20:50:59 CDR GC: catalog recovery begin > > > 20:51:01 CDR GC: catalog recovery complete > > > > 20:51:01 CDR RQM: rqmPurgeSpool() failed for KEY (10/0/0x3/0x0)> > > dberror=-7420 thread 46 queue control_send > > > 20:51:01 CDR queuer initialization complete > > > 20:51:01 CDR NIF listening on asf://g_vfs1 > > > 20:51:01 DDR Log Snooping - Snooping started in log 63 > > > > > > > > > hi there > > > anyone knows what causes the RQM error? > > > finderr -7420 gives: > > > > > > -7420 Argument argument_name is invalid. > > > > > > Verify the arguments to the DataBlade API calls. > > > > > > but that does not help me either. > > > any help appreciated > > > regards > > > hoyte swager > > > > > > env: > > > Linux vfs1 2.4.21 #2 Wed Aug 13 12:23:17 CEST 2003 i686 unknown > > > IBM Informix Dynamic Server Version 9.40.UC2E1 -- On-Line (Prim) --Up > > > 00:05:02 -- 471464 Kbytes > > > > > > > > > > > >

↪ replying to Madison Pruet

Jonathan Leffler — Sun, 26 Oct 2003 06:21:00 GMT — source: Usenet: comp.databases.informix

Madison Pruet wrote: > I thought that UC3 was out now. > "Hoyte Swager" <h.swager@chello.nl> wrote: >>will do >>btw is 9.40-UC2E1 the most current release? 9.40.UC2 is the most current release. 9.40.UC3 is due out (just) before Christmas. I'm not sure exactly what the E1 suffix means, but you are very close to as up to date as possible (it is probably some sort of patch/maintenance release based on 9.40.UC2). Which is all the more reason to open the case since Madison says "that shouldn't be happening" but it is. -- Jonathan Leffler #include <disclaimer.h> Email: jleffler@earthlink.net, jleffler@us.ibm.com Guardian of DBD::Informix v2003.04 -- http://dbi.perl.org/

Glossary

Enterprise Replication (ER/CDR)