Re: Lawson vs SAP, etc.

nobody said: > If you wanted to keep Lawson, you could move to DB2 without too much > "pain" however, its now a new RDBMS. > > So you have to ask which is more important. Being an IBM IDS shop. (I > almost said Informix ;-) or a LAWSON shop. Just think, Dan -- SJQ on a database you don't know. How cool would that be? -- Bye now, Obnoxio "C'est pas parce qu'on n'a rien ' dire qu'il faut fermer sa gueule" - Coluche "I'm trying to see things your way, but I can't get my head up my ass" - JCH "Ogni uomo mi guarda come se fossi una testa di cazzo" - Marco http://www.catb.org/~esr/faqs/smart-questions.html sending to informix-list

Obnoxio The Clown wrote: > nobody said: > > > If you wanted to keep Lawson, you could move to DB2 without too much > > "pain" however, its now a new RDBMS. > > > > So you have to ask which is more important. Being an IBM IDS shop. (I > > almost said Informix ;-) or a LAWSON shop. > > Just think, Dan -- SJQ on a database you don't know. How cool would that be? SJQ is an "affectionate" name given (by our DBA) to a query that selects 197 columns from 10 tables with a 'where' clause that runs roughly 75 lines long. How cool would that be? Brrrrrrr!! -- JCH