Re: How to build the regex datablade
Obnoxio The Clown objected, in strong language, to Matt Penning's use of the word 'performant' in the regex DataBlade discussion. Matt replied with a dictionary definition (a performer) and joked about it joining the dictionary. DL Redden told Obnoxio to lay off the caffeine, and Obnoxio replied with an insult. A banter exchange with no technical content.
Auto-generated by Claude from the posts below — may be imperfect; read the full thread.
Matt Penning said: > > performant? For the fucking sake of fucking fuck: "performant" is not a fucking word. -- Bye now, Obnoxio "C'est pas parce qu'on n'a rien ' dire qu'il faut fermer sa gueule" - Coluche did i mention i like nulls? heck, i even go so far as to say that all columns in a table except the primary key could/should be nullable. this has certain advantages, for example, if you need to insert a child record and you don't have a parent row for it, just do an insert into the parent table with the primary key value (everything else null), and voila, relational integrity is preserved. but this is, admittedly, a bit controversial among modellers. --r937, dbforums.com
Maybe if we all keep using it, it will be added to the dictionary. Kind of like "jiggy". Actually it might be word, but with completely different meaning - from dictionary.com: Main Entry: performant Part of Speech: noun Definition: a performer Etymology: based on informant, etc. Obnoxio The Clown wrote: > Matt Penning said: > >>performant? > > > For the fucking sake of fucking fuck: "performant" is not a fucking word. >
Very nice Matt. OTC, you should lay off the caffeine. --- Matt Penning <mmpenning@yahoo.com> wrote: > Maybe if we all keep using it, it will be added to the dictionary. > Kind > of like "jiggy". > > Actually it might be word, but with completely different meaning - > from > dictionary.com: > > Main Entry: performant > Part of Speech: noun > Definition: a performer > Etymology: based on informant, etc. > > > Obnoxio The Clown wrote: > > Matt Penning said: > > > >>performant? > > > > > > For the fucking sake of fucking fuck: "performant" is not a fucking > word. > > > _______________________________________________ > Informix-list mailing list > Informix-list@iiug.org > http://www.iiug.org/mailman/listinfo/informix-list >
Matt Penning said: > > Maybe if we all keep using it, it will be added to the dictionary. Kind > of like "jiggy". I think "mongtard" might be more apt. -- Bye now, Obnoxio "C'est pas parce qu'on n'a rien ' dire qu'il faut fermer sa gueule" - Coluche did i mention i like nulls? heck, i even go so far as to say that all columns in a table except the primary key could/should be nullable. this has certain advantages, for example, if you need to insert a child record and you don't have a parent row for it, just do an insert into the parent table with the primary key value (everything else null), and voila, relational integrity is preserved. but this is, admittedly, a bit controversial among modellers. --r937, dbforums.com