Re: Any problems with INF 4.0 and SunOS upgrade?

Posted in 1991

Walt Hultgren {rmy} — Wed, 2 Oct 91 01:25:16 -0400 — source: Informix-list mailing list archive (1991-1998)

Path: emory!wupost!zaphod.mps.ohio-state.edu!ub!rutgers!pyrnj!pyramid!infmx!aland From: aland@informix.com (Colonel Panic) Newsgroups: comp.databases.informix Summary: typo Message-ID: <1991Oct1.185042.14648@informix.com> Date: 1 Oct 91 18:50:42 GMT References: <1995@endor.das.harvard.edu.harvard.edu> <1991Sep28.212433.9215@informix.com> Sender: news@informix.com (Usenet News) Organization: International Brotherhood of Geeks, Local 619 In article <1991Sep28.212433.9215@informix.com> aland@informix.com (Colonel Panic) writes: >... >been out for awhile on Sun 4 / SunOS 4.1. There's also a recent 4.10.UC2 >version that uses kernel locking instead of "create" locking, so you're Duh... make that 4.10.UC3 (3, not 2)... >not constrained to 64 simultaneous locks per process. (If you do upgrade >to 4.10.UC2 or beyond, read the release note carefully about using the ^^^UC3 >RESETLOCK environment variable to transparently convert the lock mode. It's >entitled, "Conversion of Locking Methodology using the RESETLOCK variable." -- Alan Denney aland@informix.com {pyramid|uunet}!infmx!aland Disclaimer: These opinions are mine alone. If I am caught or killed, the secretary will disavow any knowledge of my actions.