Re: Support of sql-92 select statement

Obnoxio The Clown wrote: > Richard Harnden wrote: > > >>Personally, I'd stick with the explicit tempory table aproach: portable >>all the way back to SE, you get the chance to update the stats, create >>indices, etc. > > > Coward! > ;) > Over using a tempory table ? > > I dunno, it's very possible that a temp. table gets created anyway, so > probably very little. > > Personally, I'd stick with the explicit tempory table aproach: > portable all > the way back to SE, you get the chance to update the stats, create > indices, > etc. I think the same... Chucho! -- Atte, Jes's Antonio Santos Giraldo jeansagi@myrealbox.com jeansagi@netscape.net sending to informix-list