Oninit cdi / Archive
Talk to an expert →

Re: Upgrade Solaris 2.6 to 2.8 and got memory fatal

Posted in 2004

Topics: Installation, Setup & Upgrades, Storage & Space Management, Platform-Specific Issues, Versions, Editions & End-of-Life

Jonathan Leffler — — source: Usenet: comp.databases.informix

Wayne wrote: > Murray, > My system disks lay out did not change. All I have done is upgrade > Solaris to 2.8. BTW my IDS is 9.21. Here is my online.log. Do you > think OS is 64bits causing the problem? Thank you for the input. Most likely there's insufficient resource in /etc/system -- did you remember to check that after the o/s upgrade? And it would be a good idea to upgrade from IDS 9.21, too. > --Wayne > > ******************************************************************* > iceberg% oninit > iceberg% oninit: Fatal error in shared memory initialization> > ******************************************************************* > 15:53:26 Event alarms enabled. ALARMPROG = > '/usr/informix/etc/log_full.sh' > 15:53:26 Booting Language <c> from module <> > 15:53:26 Loading Module <CNULL> > 15:53:26 Booting Language <builtin> from module <> > 15:53:26 Loading Module <BUILTINNULL> > 15:53:30 Informix Dynamic Server 2000 Version 9.21.UC4 Software> Serial Numb > er ACP#J267193 > 15:53:31 Informix Dynamic Server 2000 Initialized -- Shared Memory> Initialized. > > 15:53:31 Physical Recovery Started at Page(2:62916). > 15:54:23 Physical Recovery Complete: 128542 Pages Examined 110578> Pages Restore > d. > > 15:54:23 Logical Recovery Started. > 15:54:23 10 recovery worker threads will be started. > 15:54:26 Logical Recovery Complete.> 0 Committed, 0 Rolled Back, 0 Open, 0 Bad Locks > > 15:54:27 Informix Dynamic Server 2000 Stopped. > > 15:54:27 mt_shm_remove: WARNING: may not have removed all/correct> segments > > ********************************************************************* > > "Murray Wood (IList)" <ifxmaillist@quanta.co.nz> wrote in message news:<c79evk$ujt$1@terabinaries.xmission.com>... > >>Wayne >> >>In the Solaris upgrade did you allocate or reconfigure any disk space? >>Are you using any Volume manager such as Disksuite? If so you may need to do something to the volume manager. Are the new volumes pointing to the same place in disk as they did before the upgrade? >> >>The informix log may have more information. It looks like it is saying that the chunk is not as it expected to to be..something is now corrupt. >> >>MW >> -- Jonathan Leffler #include <disclaimer.h> Email: jleffler@earthlink.net, jleffler@us.ibm.com Guardian of DBD::Informix v2003.04 -- http://dbi.perl.org/

↪ replying to Jonathan Leffler
David Williams — — source: Usenet: comp.databases.informix

"Jonathan Leffler" <jleffler@earthlink.net> wrote in message news:BBjmc.8972$V97.3277@newsread1.news.pas.earthlink.net... > Wayne wrote: > > > Murray, > > My system disks lay out did not change. All I have done is upgrade > > Solaris to 2.8. BTW my IDS is 9.21. Here is my online.log. Do you > > think OS is 64bits causing the problem? Thank you for the input. > Check /etc/services has the entries for Informix. I remember upgrading Solaris 2.5.1 to 2.6 and the /etc/services went back to the default one shipped with Solaris and lost all my changes! > Most likely there's insufficient resource in /etc/system -- did you > remember to check that after the o/s upgrade? > > And it would be a good idea to upgrade from IDS 9.21, too. > > > --Wayne > > > > ******************************************************************* > > iceberg% oninit > > iceberg% oninit: Fatal error in shared memory initialization> > > > ******************************************************************* > > 15:53:26 Event alarms enabled. ALARMPROG = > > '/usr/informix/etc/log_full.sh' > > 15:53:26 Booting Language <c> from module <> > > 15:53:26 Loading Module <CNULL> > > 15:53:26 Booting Language <builtin> from module <> > > 15:53:26 Loading Module <BUILTINNULL> > > 15:53:30 Informix Dynamic Server 2000 Version 9.21.UC4 Software> > Serial Numb > > er ACP#J267193 > > 15:53:31 Informix Dynamic Server 2000 Initialized -- Shared Memory> > Initialized. > > > > 15:53:31 Physical Recovery Started at Page(2:62916). > > 15:54:23 Physical Recovery Complete: 128542 Pages Examined 110578> > Pages Restore > > d. > > > > 15:54:23 Logical Recovery Started. > > 15:54:23 10 recovery worker threads will be started. > > 15:54:26 Logical Recovery Complete.> > 0 Committed, 0 Rolled Back, 0 Open, 0 Bad Locks > > > > 15:54:27 Informix Dynamic Server 2000 Stopped. > > > > 15:54:27 mt_shm_remove: WARNING: may not have removed all/correct> > segments > > > > ********************************************************************* > > > > "Murray Wood (IList)" <ifxmaillist@quanta.co.nz> wrote in message news:<c79evk$ujt$1@terabinaries.xmission.com>... > > > >>Wayne > >> > >>In the Solaris upgrade did you allocate or reconfigure any disk space? > >>Are you using any Volume manager such as Disksuite? If so you may need to do something to the volume manager. Are the new volumes pointing to the same place in disk as they did before the upgrade? > >> > >>The informix log may have more information. It looks like it is saying that the chunk is not as it expected to to be..something is now corrupt. > >> > >>MW > >> > > > -- > Jonathan Leffler #include <disclaimer.h> > Email: jleffler@earthlink.net, jleffler@us.ibm.com > Guardian of DBD::Informix v2003.04 -- http://dbi.perl.org/ >

Glossary