Re: NETTYPE
Posted in 2000
Paul Watson wrote: > > > From: Gerson Finlev <gerson@informix.com> > > > > > >NUMCPUVPS 2 (You should never have more CPUvps that processors) > > > > > >-- > > >Gerson Finlev, Performance Engineering, i.informix > > Sorry disagree this used to be the case but with the faster processors > e.g. 450M Sparcs you can get a noticeable improvement running at 2 per > CPU It's got to be a crap scheduler that gives more time to three (or four) processes than it does to two! And yes, I've also heard that this helps on some platforms. But it defies the laws of physics..., Captain! Or at least the laws of kernel tuning. :-) Cheers, -- Mark. +----------------------------------------------------------+-----------+ | Mark D. Stock mailto:mdstock@mydas.freeserve.co.uk |//////// /| | http://www.informix.com http://www.informixhandbook.com |///// / //| | http://www.iiug.org +-----------------------------------+//// / ///| | |What year 2000 bug? year 2000 bug? |/// / ////| | |year 2000 bug? year 2000 bug? year |// / /////| | |2000 bug? year 2000 bug? year 1900 |/ ////////| +----------------------+-----------------------------------+-----------+