Re: Informix transactional replication
Posted in 2007
Topics: High Availability & Replication
Davorin Kremenjas wrote: > "Art S. Kagel" <kagel@bloomberg.net> wrote in message > news:45AFD3D4.5090706@bloomberg.net... > >> mladen.spoljaric@gmail.com wrote: > >>> Hi all! >>> >>> Since I'm new to Informix, I'd like to get quick info to take furder >>> steps in learning about and finally setting up transactional >>> replication in a way that is supported on MS SQL Server. >>> Can transactional replication based on row insert, update and delete be >>> setup on Informix DB as source of replication so target would be some >>> other kind of RDBMS (mySQL possibly). > >> No. The only way to replicate between IDS and some other database server >> than another IDS instance would be to use a third party replication >> product or to use the Informix Datablade API to create your own primary >> access method to replicate all changes. >> >> Setting up two IDS instances to replicate is very easy and there are two >> flavors of replication. HDR (High Availability Data Replication) >> replicates the entire server instance while ER (Enterprise Replication) is >> more flexible and is set up at the table level and you can control what >> rows are replicated and to where. >> >> Art S. Kagel > > But it does pose an interesting idea: since ER already is SQL based it seems > possible not only to send SQL to targets but also capture it, let's say in a > file, in ANSI SQL flavour, and use that on other RDMBS'es. > vNext++ maybe? :o) ER is not SQL based. We use SQL statements to define what is being replicated, but do not apply using SQL. > >
"Madison Pruet" <mpruet@tx.rr.com> wrote in message news:45B0DD10.6000803@tx.rr.com... > Davorin Kremenjas wrote: >> But it does pose an interesting idea: since ER already is SQL based it >> seems possible not only to send SQL to targets but also capture it, let's >> say in a file, in ANSI SQL flavour, and use that on other RDMBS'es. >> vNext++ maybe? :o) > ER is not SQL based. We use SQL statements to define what is being > replicated, but do not apply using SQL. Then I misunderstood the manual. I'll have another look at it.