Re: Informix NOT! in the news.

I want to vouch for Mike. I clicked on his link on his e-mail early this morning (7:00 CDT) and it did NOT have "Informix Software" listed. It only said "Oracle, IBM and other database makers." It's been modfied sometime within the last 3 hours. Plus, I don't consider any database usuable for multi-user applications that does not have row-level locking. Informix standard engine even has that. Candy -- Candy McCall ONLINE Computing, Inc. (candym@olcinc.com) -----Original Message----- From: jparker@epsilon.com <jparker@epsilon.com> To: informix-list@iiug.org <informix-list@iiug.org> Date: Tuesday, June 02, 1998 8:23 AM Subject: Re: Informix NOT! in the news. >Mikey, do you need glasses? > >cheers >j. > > > > >Mike Segel <mikey@segel.NOSPAM-.KING.OF.MYDOMAIN.-NOSPAM.com> on 06/01/98 >11:20:17 PM > >Please respond to Mike Segel > <mikey@segel.NOSPAM-.KING.OF.MYDOMAIN.-NOSPAM.com> > >To: informix-list@iiug.org >cc: (bcc: Jack Parker/Boston50/Epsilon) >Subject: Informix NOT! in the news. > > > > >Wow! >Talk about being snubbed! >Check out this article: >http://www.news.com/News/Item/0,4,22639,00.html?st.ne.fd.gif.d >Informix wasn't mentioned at all. >What does that tell us? >-Mikey >-- >#include <std_disclaimer.h> /* Mike Segel (MS385) */ >#include <No_Spam.h> >#ifdef OFFENDED_BY_CONTENT >The author takes no responsibility for this post. >Any resembalence to a coherent rational thought is purely coincidence. >-The Management. >#endif >***************************** >* Attention * >-*- Due to AGIS's Refusal to Act Responsibly >-*- Due to ACSI's Refusal to Act Responsibly >We are blocking all of their domains at the packet level. >This block will exist until they modify their policies to >conform to existing RFCs and net community standards. >We encourage all ISPs and domain holders to do the same. >***************************** > > > > > > >