Re: onbar vs onarchive

From: "Mark D. Stock" <mdstock@mydas.freeserve.co.uk> > >Thanh wrote: > > > > In article <8vb2s1$cdk$1@news.xmission.com>, > > "Obnoxio The Clown" <obnoxio@hotmail.com> wrote: > > > > > > From: "Andy Kent" <andykent.bristol.DontSpamMe@virgin.net> > > > > > > > >What experiences do folk have of using onbar and onarchive? My > > memories are > > > >of onbar being a pain to set up but onarchive being full of bugs (at > > least > > > >in its earlier versions). > > > > > > > >What are the relevant merits and which are people using? > > > > > > Wotcha, cock! > > > > > > OnArchive is still a seething mass of evil horror. Do not touch! > > > > > > OnBAR isn't particularly difficult to set up, especially not compared > > to > > > OnArchive. > > > > I thought I heard that OnArchive will be obsoleted in IDS-9.3x > >We've been waiting for that message since version 6.00! :-) > >The summary probably looks like: > >Utility Easy to set up Easy to use >~~~~~~~~~ ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ ~~~~~~~~~~~ >OnTape Yes Yes >OnArchive No No >OnBar No Yes You forgot: Utility Can you restore backups? ~~~~~~~~~ ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ OnTape Yes OnArchive No OnBar Yes _____________________________________________________________________________________ Get more from the Web. FREE MSN Explorer download : http://explorer.msn.com