Re: IDS 9.20 panic

No registered datablades. We aren't really using any extended functionality of IDS 9.20. The engine is just being used to support, principally, a bought-in Financials package written in COBOL with an Informix interface, and some 4GL/VisualBasic applications. As mentioned previously, I have recently increased STACKSIZE fro 32->128 to fix an unrelated problem. Rob Wilson <rwilson@ntsource.com> wrote in message news:39ecb512.25295442@news.informix.com... > What blades do you have registered in the database? I have seen > similar errors with web datablade when some pages were generating too > many variables. The solution for that was to increase the stack size > (and decrease the number of variables). > > On Mon, 16 Oct 2000 19:05:22 +0100, "Neil Truby" > <ntruby@netcomuk.co.uk> wrote: > > >IDS 9.20 FC2 on HP-UX 11.0 > > > >Has anyone come a similar error to the one below? I've had it twice now, > >once on a production instance and once on a test. Tech Support aren't > >coming up with much. I wonder whether to escalate it: > > > >thanks > >Neil > > > >11:08:45 Checkpoint loguniq 43086, logpos 0xdb3300 > > > >11:09:45 Assert Failed: Thread stack overflow detected > > > >11:09:45 Informix Dynamic Server 2000 Version 9.20.F > >11:09:45 Who: Session(90006, patelh@archer, 24662, 1803983912) > > Thread(94820, sqlexec, c00000006b825108, 3) > > File: mt_stack.c Line: 160 > >11:09:45 stack trace for pid 961 written to /var/tmp/af.764cc769 > >11:09:46 ERROR: Exception recursion in afhandler (thread 94820). > >11:09:46 Fatal error in ADM VP at mt.c:10361 > >11:09:46 Unexpected virtual processor termination, pid = 961, exit =0x100 > > > >11:09:46 PANIC: Attempting to bring system down > >11:18:33 Segment locked: addr=0x272000, size=790327296> > > > > > > > -- > Rob Wilson > rwilson@ntsource.com >

What does the /tmp/af file say? Neil Truby wrote in message <8sif3l$ldh$1@taliesin2.netcom.net.uk>... >No registered datablades. We aren't really using any extended functionality >of IDS 9.20. The engine is just being used to support, principally, a >bought-in Financials package written in COBOL with an Informix interface, >and some 4GL/VisualBasic applications. > >As mentioned previously, I have recently increased STACKSIZE fro 32->128 to >fix an unrelated problem. > >Rob Wilson <rwilson@ntsource.com> wrote in message >news:39ecb512.25295442@news.informix.com... >> What blades do you have registered in the database? I have seen >> similar errors with web datablade when some pages were generating too >> many variables. The solution for that was to increase the stack size >> (and decrease the number of variables). >> >> On Mon, 16 Oct 2000 19:05:22 +0100, "Neil Truby" >> <ntruby@netcomuk.co.uk> wrote: >> >> >IDS 9.20 FC2 on HP-UX 11.0 >> > >> >Has anyone come a similar error to the one below? I've had it twice now, >> >once on a production instance and once on a test. Tech Support aren't >> >coming up with much. I wonder whether to escalate it: >> > >> >thanks >> >Neil >> > >> >11:08:45 Checkpoint loguniq 43086, logpos 0xdb3300 >> > >> >11:09:45 Assert Failed: Thread stack overflow detected >> > >> >11:09:45 Informix Dynamic Server 2000 Version 9.20.F >> >11:09:45 Who: Session(90006, patelh@archer, 24662, 1803983912) >> > Thread(94820, sqlexec, c00000006b825108, 3) >> > File: mt_stack.c Line: 160 >> >11:09:45 stack trace for pid 961 written to /var/tmp/af.764cc769 >> >11:09:46 ERROR: Exception recursion in afhandler (thread 94820). >> >11:09:46 Fatal error in ADM VP at mt.c:10361 >> >11:09:46 Unexpected virtual processor termination, pid = 961, exit =>0x100 >> > >> >11:09:46 PANIC: Attempting to bring system down >> >11:18:33 Segment locked: addr=0x272000, size=790327296>> > >> > >> > >> >> -- >> Rob Wilson >> rwilson@ntsource.com >> > >