Re: Looking for a risk overview
Posted in 2004
I heartily endorse Art's comments. I would think that these are recorded in a text book somewhere. But knowing textbook and manual writers they use jargon which Art has tried to avoid. Malcolm ----- Original Message ----- From: "Art S. Kagel" <kagel@bloomberg.net> To: <informix-list@iiug.org> Sent: Tuesday, January 13, 2004 11:29 PM Subject: Re: Looking for a risk overview > On Tue, 13 Jan 2004 10:59:49 -0500, Jon Zero wrote: > > Data can be lost if and only if you do at least one of the following no-nos: > > - You do not have a good recovery plan including system and database archives > - You do not save logical logs to tape and/or disk (or save them to the same > disk structure that the database is using!) > - You use UNLOGGED databases > - Your disk controllers volatile memory use write-back cacheing > - Your disk controllers have non-volatile memory, use write-back cacheing, > and you are forced to scratch the memory because of an unrecoverable hard > disk crash. > > There is an increased risk of data loss under the following conditions: > > - You use BUFFERED LOG databases > - You use RAID5 disk arrays > - You save logical logs to disk but do not sweep them periodically to tape or > to another physical machine and/or location > - You perform diligent archives and log backups to secure media but do not > take copies of same offsite > > One should recognise that all of these have little to do with Informix. > IBM/Informix Dynamic Server is a secure reliable RDBMS that is capable of > recovery from almost any soft or mildly hard server or system crash. It > provides two different systems of server archive one of which integrates with > all major system archive software vendors' products and using those archives > and logical log backups can recover to within a few seconds of the crash the > server's final state at the time of the crash and to rollback transactions > not completed to that point insuring a consistent data image. > > Anyone want to vouch for the authoritativeness of the statements above and/or > their source? > > Art S. Kagel > > > Hi- > > This may be kind of a strange question but Im gonna try anyway. Im > > looking for an overview (either diagram or whitepaper) for a non-technical > > person that explains how data can be lost if power is unexpectidly cut from > > an informix server. If possible this source should come from some place > > authoratative. > > > > Any ideas? > > > > Jon > sending to informix-list