Translating with DrWatson… this can take a few seconds the first time.
This is a genuine, complex translation. DrWatson protects commands, error codes, and log output while naturally translating the surrounding text. It’s translated once and saved.
Marc Demhartner asked about performance cost of Informix encryption on 14.10.FC7 with large tables. Paul Watson and Art Kagel said Encryption at Rest has no noticeable impact beyond slightly higher CPU, while column-level encryption does cost; Paul relayed an unofficial IBM view against it. Art explained EAR covers all storage and SSL/PAM can encrypt client traffic.
Auto-generated by Claude from the posts below — may be imperfect; read the full thread.
Marc Demhartner — source: IBM Community (ConnectedCommunity.org) Informix forum
I wanted to ask you guys about your experience with performance degradation of enabled DB encryption in Informix.
We have tables with 100 columns and 30 million records, does the activated inplace encryption of the Informix DB still play a big role or is it hardly measurable in terms of performance whether it is encrypted or not?
Suggest we´re using 14.10FC7 with RHEL7 on some multicore CPU VMs
------------------------------
Marc Demhartner
------------------------------
#Informix
↪ replying to Marc Demhartner
Paul Watson — source: IBM Community (ConnectedCommunity.org) Informix forum
If you mean EAR then you won't notice it
↪ replying to Marc Demhartner
Art Kagel — source: IBM Community (ConnectedCommunity.org) Informix forum
Marc:
I agree with Paul. If you are thinking of use Informix Encryption at Rest there is no noticeable impact. CPU usage will be a little bit higher, but if you are not bumping up against 0% idle now it's no biggie.
If, on the other hand, you are talking about column level encryption, that's a different animal. There will be an impact.
Art
------------------------------
Art S. Kagel, President and Principal Consultant
ASK Database Management Corp.
www.askdbmgt.com
------------------------------
↪ replying to Art Kagel
Paul Watson — source: IBM Community (ConnectedCommunity.org) Informix forum
The 110% unofficial line I got from IBM was do not use column level encryption cos <quote>its crap</quote>
↪ replying to Paul Watson
Marc Demhartner — source: IBM Community (ConnectedCommunity.org) Informix forum
Thanks for prompt reply - and the different option? in transit - so if only a few specific tables would be encrypted / decrypted during runtime ?
------------------------------
Marc Demhartner
------------------------------
↪ replying to Marc Demhartner
Art Kagel — source: IBM Community (ConnectedCommunity.org) Informix forum
Marc:
Encryption at Rest (EAR) is at the server level. All storage for the instance is encrypted on disk and in flight between the disk and the server instance. Data is only decrypted when it is accessed inside the server. It would be all data in all tables. Then, separately, you can encrypt the data in flight to clients using SSL and PAM connection types making the encryption end-to-end.
Art
------------------------------
Art S. Kagel, President and Principal Consultant
ASK Database Management Corp.
www.askdbmgt.com
------------------------------
Your privacy choices
We use strictly necessary cookies to make this site work. With your
consent we’d also use optional cookies for analytics and marketing. You can accept all,
reject all, or choose. Read our Cookie Policy.