Re: oncheck -me

I was very surprised to see these tutorials published. But the details of them were in an IIUG mailer, so somebody must have made a conscious decision to release them to us. If they are now to be removed it makes IIUG look a little less than competent. regards Malcolm ----- Original Message ----- From: "Jonathan Leffler" <jleffler@earthlink.net> To: <informix-list@iiug.org> Sent: Wednesday, October 22, 2003 6:22 AM Subject: Re: oncheck -me > Andrew Hamm wrote: > > > Madison Pruet wrote: > > > >>Yep - uses very little logs. > >>But I don't think that it is recoverable. > >> > >>I agree that the feature is much needed, but a feature needs to be > >>tested and stable before it is documented. > >> > >>The RAS features (RASHELP) were not supposed to be used except by tech > >>support. > > > > > > Then somebody made a boo-boo letting that one slip out to a training > > document? > > That one for sure - I'm not wholly convinced that any of them should > have been released. I didn't notice that it was on the externally > accessible web site at first; I assumed the tutorials were on the > internal web only until enlightened by Madison. > > They may be removed - in fact, someone reported having problems > accessing them and it may be because they are no longer there.... > > -- > Jonathan Leffler #include <disclaimer.h> > Email: jleffler@earthlink.net, jleffler@us.ibm.com > Guardian of DBD::Informix v2003.04 -- http://dbi.perl.org/ > sending to informix-list