RE: oncheck -me

It was mentioned as a way of getting more options to the onstat command (and boy do you get some more !!) but not in the context of oncheck. -> -----Original Message----- -> From: Paul Watson [mailto:paul@oninit.com] -> Sent: Wednesday, October 22, 2003 9:20 AM -> To: informix-list@iiug.org -> Subject: Re: oncheck -me -> -> -> Isn't RASHELP discussed as part of the internal course? -> -> Andrew Hamm wrote: -> > -> > Madison Pruet wrote: -> > > Yep - uses very little logs. -> > > But I don't think that it is recoverable. -> > > -> > > I agree that the feature is much needed, but a feature -> needs to be -> > > tested and stable before it is documented. -> > > -> > > The RAS features (RASHELP) were not supposed to be used -> except by tech -> > > support. -> > -> > Then somebody made a boo-boo letting that one slip out to -> a training -> > document? -> -> -- -> Paul Watson # -> Oninit Ltd # Growing old is mandatory -> Tel: +44 1436 672201 # Growing up is optional -> Fax: +44 1436 678693 # -> Mob: +44 7818 003457 # -> www.oninit.com # -> ********************************************************************************** This message is sent in strict confidence for the addressee only. It may contain legally privileged information. The contents are not to be disclosed to anyone other than the addressee. Unauthorised recipients are requested to preserve this confidentiality and to advise the sender immediately of any error in transmission. This footnote also confirms that this email message has been swept for the presence of computer viruses, however we cannot guarantee that this message is free from such problems. ********************************************************************************** sending to informix-list