RE: Migration from 7.31 to 9.40
It was an in place upgrade, very easy, very quick (apart from the
onchecks!!!!!!)
Regards
Colin Dawson
>From: "Dirk Moolman" <DirkM@mxo.co.za>
>To: <informix-list@iiug.org>
>Subject: RE: Migration from 7.31 to 9.40
>Date: Tue, 28 Jun 2005 11:04:08 +0200
>
>
>-----Original Message-----
>From: owner-informix-list@iiug.org [mailto:owner-informix-list@iiug.org]
>On Behalf Of Neil Truby
>Sent: 27 June 2005 07:04 PM
>To: informix-list@iiug.org
>Subject: Re: Migration from 7.31 to 9.40
>
>"Dirk Moolman" <DirkM@mxo.co.za> wrote in message
>news:1119882085.c2b0b34ea858058704682a6037cfceb7@teranews...
> >
> > I have a question for you: how much space did you use before the
> > upgrade, and how much space after the upgrade ?
> >
> > Or was it all in-place and you are still sitting with the same layout?
> >
> >If he has a 290 million row table which took 9 hours just to run an
>oncheck> >on, you can be pretty sure that he did an in-place upgarde I would have
>
> >thought.
>
>
>
>My main concern is just the space. I will be upgrading from 7.31 to 10
>soon, if all goes as planned.
>
>Is the extra space only because of the detached indexes, or are there
>other changes that will also increase the space used ? (and if so, by
>how much more or less)
>
>
>
>
>
>sending to informix-list
sending to informix-list