Re: Best HTML Editor for IIF 2000 & Linux?
Posted in 2000
Hi Farrell, Give us details about all your experiences with these editors. Would love to hear all about your experiences - pros and cons I am testing out Dreamweaver 3 and it is amazing so far. I feel damm sorry for those guys with the vi blockage in their arteries. Poor souls. They are still stuck on the dot command. Moses "Farrell, Thom" wrote: > > > >To all you die hard vi fans, if you enjoy spending very many hours > doing a > >humanly impossible task of open <td> close </td> writing HTML then > you > >should be happy and content with vi, but if you want to enter the > 20th > >century you need something better and as I am discovering there are > some > >very nifty HTML editors out there that take out the hand coding > altogether. > >I would have preferred one that runs under Linux and possibly > integrated > >with Informix, but for now I have to be content with moving the HTML > back > >and forth from Windows to Linux which is a pain. > > This may be somewhat redundant as I haven't been following this > thread. > Some alternatives you may be interested in are as follows: > > IBM's TopPage (currently Beta using WINE) > Quanta+ > Bluefish > Webmaker > CoffeeCup > > There are a large number of alternatives. A quick look at > http://www.freshmeat.net will turn up a great deal more then those > listed above. I use mostly bluefish and some webmaker but I have been > getting tempted to try Quanta+. > > Thom >