Re: ENOMEM / MAXMEM Problem -- tuning?
Posted in 1999
Topics: Performance & Tuning, Server Administration
SCO 3.2.5.0.5 does not have a MAXMEM kernel
parameter, it's actually MAXUMEM. I have changed
MAXUMEM to 1048574, which is double the recommended value.
George Clooney` ''('') ''''''''' 'ۼ'''''''''...
>Hi,
>
>Had a new SCO (5.04) Compaq server up and running with Dynamic Server
>7.30.UC2. Added a tape drive. Relinked Unix kernel.
>
>Don't know whether they're related, per se, but all of a sudden I get the
>following, when I try to kick off "oninit":
>
>"08:54:37 shmat: [ENOMEM][12]: out of available data space, check
system
>MAXMEM
>
>08:54:37 mt_shm_init: can't create resident segment">
>Firstly, I didn't change my onconfig settings between one day to
>the next. BUT, be that as it may, the closest setting I can find
>referring to ENOMEM is CDR_ENOMEM and I'm not sure
>what that does to/for me.
>
>Anyone have any ideas what might have gone wrong?
>
>TIA,
>
>- Matt Berg
>matt@nospam.acsne.com
>(Drop "nospam" for replies)
>
>
>
>
>
>
Thanks! Will give it a try . . .
DH Lee wrote in message <7gthth$ls24@www.na.informix.com>...
>SCO 3.2.5.0.5 does not have a MAXMEM kernel
>parameter, it's actually MAXUMEM. I have changed
>MAXUMEM to 1048574, which is double the recommended value.
>
>
>>Hi,
>>
>>Had a new SCO (5.04) Compaq server up and running with Dynamic Server
>>7.30.UC2. Added a tape drive. Relinked Unix kernel.
>>
>>Don't know whether they're related, per se, but all of a sudden I get the
>>following, when I try to kick off "oninit":
>>
>>"08:54:37 shmat: [ENOMEM][12]: out of available data space, check
>system
>>MAXMEM
>>
>>08:54:37 mt_shm_init: can't create resident segment">>
>>Firstly, I didn't change my onconfig settings between one day to
>>the next. BUT, be that as it may, the closest setting I can find
>>referring to ENOMEM is CDR_ENOMEM and I'm not sure
>>what that does to/for me.
>>
>>Anyone have any ideas what might have gone wrong?
>>
>>TIA,
>>
>>- Matt Berg
>>matt@nospam.acsne.com
>>(Drop "nospam" for replies)
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>
>