onbar and ontape running together

Anybody know the side effects of having a level 0 archive through onbar running at the same time as a level 0 archive through ontape? Obviously these are going to separate devices. I'd like to start an ontape -s -L 0 process at a certain hour, but it's going to run through the time when I have a cronjob that fires off onbar -b -L 0. Just wondering if it'll blow up on me. -- Phillip

I've never tried it, but I think it will 'work'. However, I would not take a Level-1 with either method until I had run (without interference) the Level-0 with that same method. I'm not sure which backup will last post the archive time stamps in the database. JM2CW, Doug "Phillip Tien" <phillip.tien@wholefoods.com> wrote in message news:38AC214C.C4687A43@wholefoods.com... > Anybody know the side effects of having a level 0 archive through onbar > running at the same time as a level 0 archive through ontape? Obviously > these are going to separate devices. I'd like to start an ontape -s -L > 0 process at a certain hour, but it's going to run through the time when > I have a cronjob that fires off onbar -b -L 0. Just wondering if it'll > blow up on me. > > -- > Phillip >