RE: Switch from AIX to NT???
>-----Original Message----- >From: Karl & Betty Schendel [mailto:schendel@kbcomputer.com] >Sent: Thursday, October 26, 2000 1:39 PM >To: informix-list@iiug.org >Subject: Re: Switch from AIX to NT??? > > >In article <8t9mgt$nn4$1@nnrp1.deja.com>, thamus <thamus@my-deja.com> >wrote: >[snip] >> Linux has better performance (depending on the application). >> But NT works, and it works well. I can do anything on NT >> that I can on unix, just in a different manner. > Why does this cause so much anger? >Because NT *doesn't* work, not well at all. It makes an OK desktop, >compared to win95 say, but as a server it's unreliable, aggravating, >slow, obstructive, tedious, and annoying. All I have to do to just >about any NT machine to get a blue-screen-of-death out of it, is >simply >*sit* in front of it for a couple days...even if I'm working from >my laptop and not touching the NT machine. Hey, who the hell are you to say that NT doesnt work?? I think you are a piece of sh*t. BSOD only happens to ppl like d*ck heads (you included) who open the email from unknown origins with executable attachments. All the sh*t you say sounds like your system has been setup by some bozo (you maybe?). go f^ck yerself, b*tch (yes, you!) ------------------------------------------------------------ --== Sent via Deja.com http://www.deja.com/ ==-- Before you buy.
Gracious me, such venom from a small child. It's a little hard to treat you like an adult and take you seriously when you throw a childish temper tantrum. Please, come back when you grow up! "Deja User" <sector5@my-deja.com> wrote in message news:8ta72k$hf9$1@news.xmission.com... > > > > >-----Original Message----- > >From: Karl & Betty Schendel [mailto:schendel@kbcomputer.com] > >Sent: Thursday, October 26, 2000 1:39 PM > >To: informix-list@iiug.org > >Subject: Re: Switch from AIX to NT??? > > > > > >In article <8t9mgt$nn4$1@nnrp1.deja.com>, thamus <thamus@my-deja.com> > >wrote: > >[snip] > >> Linux has better performance (depending on the application). > >> But NT works, and it works well. I can do anything on NT > >> that I can on unix, just in a different manner. > > Why does this cause so much anger? > > >Because NT *doesn't* work, not well at all. It makes an OK desktop, > >compared to win95 say, but as a server it's unreliable, aggravating, > >slow, obstructive, tedious, and annoying. All I have to do to just > >about any NT machine to get a blue-screen-of-death out of it, is >simply > >*sit* in front of it for a couple days...even if I'm working from > >my laptop and not touching the NT machine. > > > Hey, who the hell are you to say that NT doesnt work?? I think you are a piece of sh*t. BSOD only happens to ppl like d*ck heads (you included) who open the email from unknown origins with executable attachments. All the sh*t you say sounds like your system has been setup by some bozo (you maybe?). go f^ck yerself, b*tch (yes, you!) > > > > ------------------------------------------------------------ > --== Sent via Deja.com http://www.deja.com/ ==-- > Before you buy. > >