Re: how many of BUFFERS size is reasonable?

The description is wrong. Maybe I'll send a note to the documentation group about it. The onstat -R display, since 11.xx at least, shows only LOW and HIGH which is correct. Art Art S. Kagel Advanced DataTools (www.advancedatatools.com) Blog: http://informix-myview.blogspot.com/ Disclaimer: Please keep in mind that my own opinions are my own opinions and do not reflect on my employer, Advanced DataTools, the IIUG, nor any other organization with which I am associated either explicitly, implicitly, or by inference. Neither do those opinions reflect those of other individuals affiliated with any entity with which I am affiliated nor those of the entities themselves. On Fri, Feb 1, 2013 at 9:38 AM, Jason Harris <jgh@jgharris.com> wrote: > Hi Art, > > Probably 9.4/10 I thinking of, we weren't marking tables memory > resident. I think that stopped after 7.31, command still executed but > got ignored. > > 11.70/11.50 documentation shos correct onstat -R output, but in > description of the priority still shows the old scheme, LOW, MED_LOW, > MED_HIGH, HIGH. > > Can't find any explanation beyond that. > > Jason >