Re: onbar vs onarchive

From: "Andy Kent" <andykent.bristol.DontSpamMe@virgin.net> > >What experiences do folk have of using onbar and onarchive? My memories are >of onbar being a pain to set up but onarchive being full of bugs (at least >in its earlier versions). > >What are the relevant merits and which are people using? Wotcha, cock! OnArchive is still a seething mass of evil horror. Do not touch! OnBAR isn't particularly difficult to set up, especially not compared to OnArchive. _________________________________________________________________________ Get Your Private, Free E-mail from MSN Hotmail at http://www.hotmail.com. Share information about yourself, create your own public profile at http://profiles.msn.com.

In article <8vb2s1$cdk$1@news.xmission.com>, "Obnoxio The Clown" <obnoxio@hotmail.com> wrote: > > From: "Andy Kent" <andykent.bristol.DontSpamMe@virgin.net> > > > >What experiences do folk have of using onbar and onarchive? My memories are > >of onbar being a pain to set up but onarchive being full of bugs (at least > >in its earlier versions). > > > >What are the relevant merits and which are people using? > > Wotcha, cock! > > OnArchive is still a seething mass of evil horror. Do not touch! > > OnBAR isn't particularly difficult to set up, especially not compared to > OnArchive. I thought I heard that OnArchive will be obsoleted in IDS-9.3x Thanh Sent via Deja.com http://www.deja.com/ Before you buy.