Re: Security options at different SQL-Databases with ODBC - who is best ?

guest wrote: :In <542uit$g64@nntp.idgonline.no> Nils.Myklebust@idg.no (Nils Myklebust) :wrote: :: In the meantime I'll take your argument at face value. :: They are wrong and bad. : : I could agree that my arguments were totally wrong, but what you : mean by "they are *bad*"? May be bad was a too strong word. : If you only like to hear agreed followup, : you should state clearly in your original post. I like disagreements more than agreements. Particularly if something I say isn't correct or could be made better. : Ok, I have no more : *bad* thing to say now. But please, please read something on : security such as DoD's Orange book and know some very basic security : principles before saying a disagreement is(not merely wrong but also) : bad thing. Also, remember, those guys in SAG, X/Open, ANSI CLI : group and Microsoft ODBC group are not stupid at all. They know what : they are doing and what's the impact. Don't jump to a conclusion : that ODBC is wrong(deliberate or not) or stupid or unacceptable : at here or there before fully understand it. I still doubt that these people fully understand the impact of ODBC and the problems it creates for us and so many others. I would however appreciate *very* much if you could post some explanation of what you think we can do about our problems. Thanks in advance : -g Nils.Myklebust@idg.no NM Data AS, P.O.Box 9090 Gronland, N-0133 Oslo, Norway My opinions are those of my company