In article <1994Oct11.005935.20908@wvus.org>, sford@wvus.org (Scott Ford) wrote:
> Whadd'ya think? Will table names ever be able to be represented as
> variables? Something like this could make SPL incredibly powerful for
> maintenance and routine tasks. Or shall we just stick with requiring an
> additional language (ESQL, 4GL, Shell script) to do such *complex*
> activities such as looping through many tables in a data base?
> --
> Scott F. Ford, DBA / Unix SA |
sford@wvus.org
> bps (Benefit Panel Services) | elroy.jpl.nasa.gov!wvus!sford
> 888 South Figueroa Street, Suite 1400 | Voice: (213) 489-2694
> Los Angeles, CA. 90017 | FAX: (213) 489-7973
>
> "...The bozone layer: shielding the rest of the solar
> system from the earth's harmful effects...."
suppose there was a data dictionary view that had columns:
table_name, column_name, row_number, value
i think this would let you do just about anything. the problem is that
the value would have to be a particular data type. it would have to be a
type that could represent all values of any type and there would need to
be conversion functions from that type to any other.