Re: Better locks info

Danny Wright wrote: > > Thanks for everyone's input.... > > actually, I was using something called onlocks, but if you're (Rudy's) > who-lock.sh and who-access.sh use syslocks, then it will suffer from the > same problem...... > > What I want is a fast script which tells me everything (I know, I always > want too much), but we had something pretty close to this where I used to > work..... Just take a look at the view syslocks. It looks at about 5 different tables, and has always been slow. Just strip out the tables you don't need. Cheers, -- Mark. +----------------------------------------------------------+-----------+ | Mark D. Stock mailto:mdstock@mydas.freeserve.co.uk |//////// /| | http://www.informix.com http://www.informixhandbook.com |///// / //| | http://www.iiug.org +-----------------------------------+//// / ///| | |What year 2000 bug? year 2000 bug? |/// / ////| | |year 2000 bug? year 2000 bug? year |// / /////| | |2000 bug? year 2000 bug? year 1900 |/ ////////| +----------------------+-----------------------------------+-----------+