Re: Sanity test on parition page failed...
Posted in 2007
Topics: General Discussion
On Feb 9, 2:56 am, Sergey Babitch <vinny+fi...@babitch.com> wrote: > ERROR: Parition 0X00000012 has incorrect number of pages ->used 330 < total 0. > ERROR: Sanity test on parition page failed 5:18. > ERROR: Parition 0X00000014 has incorrect number of pages ->used 334 < total 330. > ERROR: Sanity test on parition page failed 5:20. > ERROR: Parition 0X0001B543 has incorrect number of pages ->used 4 < total 0. > ERROR: Sanity test on parition page failed 5:111939. > ERROR: Parition 0X0001B544 has incorrect number of pages ->used 73 < total 69. > ERROR: Sanity test on parition page failed 5:111940. > > How can I fix this errors? > > -- > Good Luck! Sergey Babitch (SB551-RIPE) ICQ: 105517491 FreeLance Artist With the version you are using these errors look to likely be caused by a known defect in that version. It has to do with tables with active in-place alters on them. This defect was fixed in 9.40.UC5 and later in the 9.4 family. Also if it is this defect, then the errors themselves are not actual problems, but a problem with how archecker is looking at some pages and reporting problems that aren't really there.
Hi, jprenaut! On Mon, Feb 12, 2007 at 01:17:04PM -0800, jprenaut@yahoo.com wrote: > On Feb 9, 2:56 am, Sergey Babitch <vinny+fi...@babitch.com> wrote: > > > ERROR: Parition 0X00000012 has incorrect number of pages ->used 330 < total 0. > > ERROR: Sanity test on parition page failed 5:18. > > ERROR: Parition 0X00000014 has incorrect number of pages ->used 334 < total 330. > > ERROR: Sanity test on parition page failed 5:20. > > ERROR: Parition 0X0001B543 has incorrect number of pages ->used 4 < total 0. > > ERROR: Sanity test on parition page failed 5:111939. > > ERROR: Parition 0X0001B544 has incorrect number of pages ->used 73 < total 69. > > ERROR: Sanity test on parition page failed 5:111940. > > > > How can I fix this errors? > > With the version you are using these errors look to likely be caused > by a known defect in that version. It has to do with tables with > active in-place alters on them. This defect was fixed in 9.40.UC5 and > later in the 9.4 family. Also if it is this defect, then the errors > themselves are not actual problems, but a problem with how archecker > is looking at some pages and reporting problems that aren't really > there. Thanks! -- Good Luck! Sergey Babitch (SB551-RIPE) ICQ: 105517491 FreeLance Artist