Re: (Fwd) More News From San Francisco

Tim Schaefer wrote: > Cool. This coming week I'll be forming my thoughts, but I understand > Mike Segal wants to participate/spearhead in this also. We should probably > adopt some kind of standard for the proposal, and maybe those of you out > there that have had experience in drafting proposals will give some > guidance here. There's plenty of room for more participation. And I know > some of the thoughts on this will be coming from many who are still in > transit from the party... I'm Back in Chi town today, but will be in Cleveland by Tues nite. After thinking about this, I feel that we are being used. Informix seems to be too lazy to run the numbers and actually make a real marketing decision. All I intend to do, is basically ask Informix to answer several questions, remind them of a few basic facts, and then put forth the question to them. I mean, I am not an employee of Informix, and if they don't see the potential of being the first real RDBMS on Linux, well, I don't think that they should exist. I mean, let nature take its course. -Mikey (This sounds harsh, and I will followup, but I usually get paid for any consulting work I do.) -- #include <std_disclaimer.h> /* Mike Segel (MS385) */ #include <No_Spam.h> #ifdef OFFENDED_BY_CONTENT The author takes no responsibility for this post. Any resembalence to a coherent rational thought is purely coincidence. -The Management. #endif ***************************** Due to AGIS's Refusal to Act Responsibly We are blocking all of their domains at the packet level. This block will exist until AGIS modifies their policies to conform to existing RFCs and net community standards. We encourage all ISPs and domain holders to do the same. *****************************