RE: Slow performance after shmem dynamically allocated

It's a HP 10.20 and CPU issue, it's the way the processor address additional shard memory segments. We spend time configuring our HP server to not allocate additional Virtual memory segments. Wayne E. Martin Informix Database Administrator Kmart Corp. -----Original Message----- From: Colleen M. Morrow [mailto:cmmorrow@JonesDay.com] Sent: Tuesday, October 03, 2000 10:35 AM To: informix-list@iiug.org Subject: Slow performance after shmem dynamically allocated _______________________________________________________________ This message and any attachments are intended for the individual or entity named above. If you are not the intended recipient, please do not read, copy, use or disclose this communication to others; also please notify the sender by replying to this message, and then delete it from your system. Thank you. _______________________________________________________________ I've heard that there was a bug in previous versions of IDS that performance suffered after a new Virtual Memory segment was dynamically allocated. We're using 7.31.UC6 on HP 10.20. Does anyone know of any problems with that in this version? TIA. BTW, please respond directly to this address, thanks. Colleen