Re: More on Informix from Bloor Research.

inthe words of inspector cleauseau.... does your dog bite... that is not my dog..... Art S. Kagel wrote: >On Wed, 10 Nov 2004 22:44:13 -0500, John Carlson wrote: > > > >>On 10 Nov 2004 04:25:39 -0800, vavavoom_th14@yahoo.co.uk (Traveller2003) >>wrote: >> >> >> >>>Hi All, >>> >>>I need a very very strong strong drink. Last time I was this surprised was >>>when spurs won the league even though I was not born :-) Makes interesting >>>reading. Comments please and more noise people. More noise :-) >>> >>>http://www.it-analysis.com/article.php?articleid=12379 >>> >>> >>>Traveller >>> >>> >>Interesting article . . . I liked the final quote where . . . . >> >>"To conclude: there is good news and there is good news - on the one hand >>there is new technology emerging to support Informix users, while on the >>other IBM is listening." >> >>Think IBM is listening? Seems that way . . . >> >> > >One bit of bad news, IBM will not support Coppereye in the same way that >Informix supported Excaliber. This means that if there is a problem IBM and >Coppereye will be finger pointing all over out cringing heads. Ah well, >nothing's perfect. > >Art S. Kagel > >