Re: =?iso-8859-1?Q?Don=B4t?= kill me (was: onbar and onlog)

On Wed, 08 Dec 1999 15:52:41 -0500, "Art S. Kagel" <kagel@bloomberg.net> wrote: > >That's the question isn't it. If disks, including the chunk on which the >logical log was stored, were destroyed prompting a restore you are not >talking about a point-in-time restore but a full as-recent-as-I-can-get >restore. Once that as completed the last log file will BE on disk so you >can get an idea of what transactions need to be rerun and you can do that >using onlog against the disk logs. > Thank you, Art. My thoughts went to the same directions but i wasn't sure about it. The whole problem occured cause I do not use auditing and a colluege wanted to know who has changed some data rows in a wrong way. Do you know if the workload of auditing could be accepted on a system that is running pretty fast? regards, Reinhard