Oninit cdi / Archive
Talk to an expert →

Re: Raw or Buffered device?

Posted in 2003

Topics: General Discussion

Neil Truby — — source: Usenet: comp.databases.informix

"Robert A. Reissaus" <r.a.reissaus@risdi.com> wrote in message news:87ad5966.0309150551.73ac3f24@posting.google.com... > What I find funny is that all this has been > said without *anyone*; including myself asking about the configuration > (hardware/software/ifx version). Because it's irrelevant? > My point here is that it is never *SIMPLE* to change something, > regardless of what *anyone* might say. This is typically one of the things that *usually should* go without a > problem, but *sometimes* - if only because of a possible > (undetectable) hardware (combination) failure- they go horribly wrong. No. Because there are set of fundamental principles about Informix and UNIX/Linux that mean that, if executed correctly, this method *is* simple and *will* work. > So I think I (at least from my part) will consider this little item > closed. Not unless I can have the last word :-)

↪ replying to Neil Truby
Obnoxio The Clown — — source: Usenet: comp.databases.informix

Neil Truby wrote: > Not unless I can have the last word :-) Impy!!! -- "C'est pas parce qu'on n'a rien ' dire qu'il faut fermer sa gueule" - Coluche

↪ replying to Obnoxio The Clown
Impy — — source: Usenet: comp.databases.informix

Dang you...I resisted the temptation..until now... "Obnoxio The Clown" <obnoxio@hotmail.com> wrote in message news:bka08v$qoohp$1@ID-64669.news.uni-berlin.de... > Neil Truby wrote: > > > Not unless I can have the last word :-) > > Impy!!! > > -- > "C'est pas parce qu'on n'a rien ' dire qu'il faut fermer sa gueule" > - Coluche

Related threads