Re: New Features IDS 10
> > Mark, shouldn't you mend fences on the Oracle support process complaints > over in c.d.o.server? > Appears like your time would be better invested over there. > Or do you actually want us to come over and engage on your behalf? > > Cheers > Serge Just back from the IOUG event, so still reading all the c.d.o messages. Finally got to the one you mentioned - seems to me that Joel summed that one up quite nicely.
Mark Townsend wrote: >> >> Mark, shouldn't you mend fences on the Oracle support process >> complaints over in c.d.o.server? >> Appears like your time would be better invested over there. >> Or do you actually want us to come over and engage on your behalf? > Just back from the IOUG event, so still reading all the c.d.o messages. > Finally got to the one you mentioned - seems to me that Joel summed that > one up quite nicely. Oh, I'm sure I can undo his summary and extend this thread to last weeks. I'm a fan of the old testimony not the new one. Cheers Serge -- Serge Rielau DB2 Solutions Development IBM Toronto Lab
Serge Rielau said: > Mark Townsend wrote: >>> >>> Mark, shouldn't you mend fences on the Oracle support process >>> complaints over in c.d.o.server? >>> Appears like your time would be better invested over there. >>> Or do you actually want us to come over and engage on your behalf? >> Just back from the IOUG event, so still reading all the c.d.o messages. >> Finally got to the one you mentioned - seems to me that Joel summed that >> one up quite nicely. > Oh, I'm sure I can undo his summary and extend this thread to last > weeks. I'm a fan of the old testimony not the new one. Oh Christ, here we go again, cross-posting central. :o( -- Bye now, Obnoxio Information within this post contains forward looking statements within the meaning of Section 27A of the Securities Act of 1933 and Section 21B of the S E C Act of 1934. Statements that involve discussions with respect to projections of future events are not statements of historical fact and may be forward looking statements. Don't rely on them to make a decision. The poster is not a reporting company registered under the Exchange Act of 1934. I have received a life peerage from Her Majesty, who is not an officer, minister or affiliate Labour party member. I intend to recover my loan now, which could cause the parliamentary majority to go down, resulting in losses for you. Today's Labour party has: an accumulated deficit and a reliance on loans from officers and affiliates to pay expenses. It is not an operating political party. The party is going to need financing to continue as a going concern. A failure to finance could cause the party to go out of business. This report shall not be construed as any kind of investment advice or solicitation. You can lose all your money by investing in this party.