RE: Identification Number

-----Original Message----- From: Obnoxio The Clown [mailto:obnoxio@hotmail.com] Sent: Thursday, November 02, 2000 1:43 PM To: dagnew@charlottepipe.com; informix-list@iiug.org Subject: Re: Identification Number From: "Doug Agnew" <dagnew@charlottepipe.com> > >"Obnoxio The Clown" <obnoxio@hotmail.com> wrote in message >news:8tae42$jjg$1@news.xmission.com... > > > > From: "Impy" <wlinden@stritch.edu> > > > > > >"Obnoxio The Clown" <obnoxio@hotmail.com> wrote in message > > >news:8t9shm$e96$1@news.xmission.com... > > > > > > > > From: "Impy" <wlinden@stritch.edu> > > > > > > > > > >"Obnoxio The Clown" <obnoxio@hotmail.com> wrote in message > > > > >news:8t9joc$bla$1@news.xmission.com... > > > > > > > > > > > > From: "Impy" <wlinden@stritch.edu> > > > > > > > > > > > > > >He has a group number member? Why didn't I get a number? Should >I > > >post > > > > >a > > > > > > >message here requesting a number? I want a number, too! > > > > > > > > > > > > I've already got your number, baby! :-) > > > > > > > > >Can I count on that? > > > > > > > > You can dig-it, baby. > > >Well, I figure'd you'd say sum-thing like that! > > > > I can't add to that. >> > >> >>So, you bit off more than you can chew, huh?? >Ah, byte me. Your suggestion leaves me googol-eyed and perplexed.... As a matter of fact, you might even call me googol-plexed. But then, we've always had a difference of opinion. So, quit trying to RAM your ideas down my throat and I'll quit busing your chips. DRAM it, there I go again. How will we ever achieve parity in this conversation?