Translating with DrWatson… this can take a few seconds the first time.
This is a genuine, complex translation. DrWatson protects commands, error codes, and log output while naturally translating the surrounding text. It’s translated once and saved.
Savio Mario Bartholomeo Pereira asked how many of Codd's rules Informix follows and which it does not, and why. The only replies were joking remarks from Savio, Art S. Kagel and Thomas Parsli about long drawn-out discussions. No substantive answer in the thread.
Auto-generated by Claude from the posts below — may be imperfect; read the full thread.
Hi,
Any RDBMS should follow the Codd rules.
How many does Informix follow.
What are the rules that Informix follow.
What are the remaining rules that Informix doesn't follow.Mention the
reasons for that.
Rajesh
↪ replying to Savio Mario Bartholomeo Pereira
Savio — — source: Informix-list mailing list archive (1991-1998)
My My!!!!
The replies are growing day by day and all the time I thought I was asking a
silly question. Thanx one and all for ur replies.
Savio
India
Savio Mario Bartholomeo Pereira <saviop75@hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:8nlc6s$b3m1@www.informix.com...
> Hi,
> Any RDBMS should follow the Codd rules.
> How many does Informix follow.
> What are the rules that Informix follow.
> What are the remaining rules that Informix doesn't follow.Mention the
> reasons for that.
>
> Rajesh
>
>
↪ replying to Savio
Art S. Kagel — — source: Informix-list mailing list archive (1991-1998)
No subject is too trivial for us to have a long drawn out discussion over
it ;-0
Art S. Kagel
Savio wrote:
>
> My My!!!!
> The replies are growing day by day and all the time I thought I was asking a
> silly question. Thanx one and all for ur replies.
>
> Savio
> India
>
> Savio Mario Bartholomeo Pereira <saviop75@hotmail.com> wrote in message
> news:8nlc6s$b3m1@www.informix.com...
> > Hi,
> > Any RDBMS should follow the Codd rules.
> > How many does Informix follow.
> > What are the rules that Informix follow.
> > What are the remaining rules that Informix doesn't follow.Mention the
> > reasons for that.
> >
> > Rajesh
> >
> >
↪ replying to Art S. Kagel
Thomas Parsli — — source: Informix-list mailing list archive (1991-1998)
"Art S. Kagel" <kagel@bloomberg.net> writes:
> No subject is too trivial for us to have a long drawn out discussion over
> it ;-0
No it isn't!
Thomas
Your privacy choices
We use strictly necessary cookies to make this site work. With your
consent we’d also use optional cookies for analytics and marketing. You can accept all,
reject all, or choose. Read our Cookie Policy.