Performance Problems after Upgrade to 7.23UC6
Posted in 1998
Topics: Performance & Tuning, Installation, Setup & Upgrades, Migration, Import/Export & Data Conversion
Apolgies if this appears twice but I received an error sending it the =
first time and wanted to
make sure it made it.
John DeSilva
-----Original Message-----
From: John DeSilva=20
Sent: Tuesday, March 31, 1998 9:46 AM
To: 'informix-list@iiug.org'
Subject: Performance Problems after Upgrade to 7.23UC6
??????????? All suggestions greatly appreciated ???????????????
We have just recently upgrade a client machine from HPUX 9.04 / Online =
7.14UD1
to HPUX 10.20 Online 7.23UC6 and have suffered an incredible performance =
drop in the process.
The machine is a uniprocessor HP9000 G50 with 384 MB Ram. We were able =
to run 40 - 44 users at very acceptable speeds under 7.14 but at around =
30 users under 7.23 the machine takes a serious nose dive ( 5 -10 times =
slower ).
We have contacted infomix tech support who had us dbexport/dbimport the =
entire DB and run an update statistics.
We also contacted HP who had us change the DBC_MAX_PCT kernal parameter =
from 50% to 15% ( something to do with pseudoswap ).
None of these have had any significant impact although the kernal =
parameter did appear to have some affect.
The primary bottleneck apears to be the CPU. Under sar -u the system and =
user cpu usage are about equal at 50% with 0% appearing in wio and idle.
Swapinfo shows us no swapping to the two swap devices that we have but a =
new memory line showing 50% swapped ( again something to do with =
pseudoswap according to HP ).
All Online parameters were left the same as under 7.14.
I have check those parameters which the 7.2 performance tuning guide say =
affect CPU usage and all appear to be correct.
The client has a new D370 2-way on order but it is not expected to =
arrive for another 3 weeks with installation not due till the first week =
of May.
Has anyone had similar experiences with Online 7.23 and HPUX 10.20 ???
Any suggestions on what might be causing this and any possible solutions =
???
John DeSilva
MCS Limited
jads@mcs.bm